Print

Hospital Malpractice Claims Benchmarking Overview


The Purpose of Hospital Malpractice Claims Benchmarking

In claims benchmarking, you compare the number of medical malpractice claims against one hospital facility or system to the number of claims made against comparable entities. The end result, in graphic format, lets you see how your facility or system measures up to its peer group in terms of claims made against it.

Five Simple Steps to Your Benchmark

Hospital Malpractice Claims Benchmarking involves five steps. On the screen for this section, there's a tab for each of these steps:

  1. Entity’s Peer Group: Select the criteria for the types of entities/facilities whose claims you want to use for comparison. For example, if you're benchmarking a hospital with 501-750 beds, you may want to compare it to other hospitals with a similar number of beds.
  2. Peer Group’s Claims: Identify the types of claims you want to include in the peer group, based on considerations such as Claim Costs, Status, Claim Dates and other factors.
  3. Entity’s Claims: Choose the claims to benchmark for your selected entity. There are two options for this: use claims already loaded into the Advisen database to filter your results, or manually enter a claim count and loss amount.
  4. Benchmark Options: Select the types of graphs you want to see. For example, you may want to compare Frequency, Severity, Cost to Revenue, etc. You can also select how many individual graphs of the analytic(s) to produce based on the peer group.
  5. Show Graphs: Here you will view the graphs comparing the claims of your selected hospital facility to those of its peer group. Downloadable to word documents.

Moving Between Steps

Benchmarking is not a "one-way" process. You may move freely among the different tabs to change your selections. For example, you might choose to benchmark based on size or location (the Entity’s Peer Group tab). Then, after seeing the graphs for that benchmark, you might choose to return to Entity’s Peer Group to experiment with a different configuration. As you finish each step, click the Update Count button in the lower right corner of the screen to ensure that your selections have been processed.


Fig. 1, “Hospital Malpractice Claims Benchmarking Tabs.” Clicking the tabs lets you move back and forth between the different parts of the benchmarking process.

Filter Selections Sidebar (Left Side of Page):

A.

Overview – The Filter Selections sidebar for Claims Benchmarking keeps track of the various filter selections you have chosen. Whereas in Program Benchmarking the sidebar only monitors selections for peer group, in Claims Benchmarking some of the filters apply to both peer group AND the entity/facility being benchmarked. For example, a Claim Costs filter appears on the Peer Group’s Claims screen AND the Entity’s Claims screen. Since you can make different selections in the two places, it’s necessary that selections from both be shown.

Fig. 2, “Filter Selection Panel.” As you progress through the steps of benchmarking, you can always look here for a reminder of your peer group selections.

B.

Filtering Result Counts – Program Benchmarking has 1 count (the peer group) on the bottom of the sidebar. In Claims Benchmarking, there are 3 counts:

  • Peer Group: The number of entities/facilities matching the Entity Peer Group selection criteria you entered. The default is the total number of Entities for which Advisen has claims in its database.
  • Peer Claims: The number of entities/facilities matching the Claims Peer Group selection criteria. The default is the total number of claims Advisen has in its database.
  • Entity’s Claims: This count is derived from one of two sources depending on your Claims Source setting on the Entity’s Claims screen:
    1. If the Claims Source is Advisen database, then the number of claims shown here should be the number of claims matching the Entity’s Claims filters.
    2. If the Claims Source is Manual entry (the default), then the number of claims shown here should be the number of claims you have typed in the # of Claims screen.

Fig. 3, “Filtering Results Menu.” Here you can see the results of your criteria selections. Unlike Program Benchmarking, Hospital Malpractice Claims Benchmarking divides the results into three categories or “counts.”



Fig. 4, “Claims Source Menu.” The results of the Entity’s Claims count change according to your selection from this menu.